Free practice for EMREE

EMREE practice questions

Original residency entrance exam questions for physicians, with explanations.

Short answer: 14 original multiple-choice practice questions for physicians preparing for EMREE, the Emirates Medical Residency Entrance Examination, each with the correct answer and a full explanation. They cover all seven blueprint subjects, are original and are not real exam items.

About these questions
  • Every question here is original. Meddex wrote it for exam preparation. None is a real, recalled or leaked exam item, and none comes from DHA, Prometric, UAE University or the NIHS.
  • Meddex is independent and is not affiliated with DHA, Prometric, UAE University or the NIHS.
  • Clinical review of the question bank is not complete yet. Treat the explanations as study aids and check official guidance before you rely on a fact.
  • This is a sample, not the whole bank, and doing well on it does not predict an exam result.

The exam these questions prepare you for

The organiser's portal says EMREE is usually 120 questions in 3 hours, computer based, with some unscored trial questions. It lists a pass mark of 60 percent for the 2025 to 2026 cycle and says the minimum is set periodically, so check the current cycle. The organiser does not state the number of answer options or any negative marking. Meddex practice items use four options with one best answer, as a practice format.

The organiser publishes a blueprint with seven subjects and their weights: internal medicine 20 percent, obstetrics and gynaecology, paediatrics, surgery and family medicine 15 percent each, and psychiatry and public health 10 percent each. It says the distribution may differ by up to 5 percent in each category.

What this set covers

This set has 14 questions drawn from 7 of the seven EMREE subjects, so each subject appears. The topic pages below give ten questions on each subject.

Questions are spread across the subjects, so you meet each one rather than five of the same kind. The set is fixed and chosen by a simple rule, so the same questions appear every time you come back.

How to use these questions

Read the stem and cover the options if you can, then decide what you would do. Choose an answer before you press Show answer. If you were wrong, read the reason for your option as well as the correct one, and write down the idea you missed.

  1. Answer all the questions once without looking.
  2. Press Show answer one question at a time and read every explanation.
  3. List the subjects where you missed two or more, then use the topic pages or the app to practise those.

Practice questions

  1. Question 1

    Internal MedicineEasy

    A 70-year-old woman takes furosemide and omeprazole. She has muscle cramps and palpitations. Potassium is 2.7 mmol/L despite 3 days of oral potassium supplements, and the ECG shows a prolonged QT interval. Serum magnesium is 0.4 mmol/L (reference 0.7 to 1.0). Which is the most appropriate next step?

    • Option A: Give potassium at 40 mmol/hour through a peripheral cannula
    • Option B: Double the oral potassium dose and recheck in a week
    • Option C: Replace magnesium intravenously while continuing potassium
    • Option D: Start spironolactone alone and stop all supplements
    Show answer for question 1

    Correct answer: C. Replace magnesium intravenously while continuing potassium

    Hypomagnesaemia causes refractory hypokalaemia because low intracellular magnesium allows potassium to leak through renal outer medullary potassium channels, so the kidney keeps wasting it. Potassium will not correct until magnesium is replaced. Loop diuretics and long-term proton pump inhibitors are common causes, and both lower magnesium. Magnesium is given intravenously when the deficit is severe or the QT is prolonged, and potassium is continued. Fast peripheral potassium infusion risks arrhythmia and vein injury, and potassium-sparing diuretics do not correct the magnesium deficit.

    • Why A is wrong. A rate of 40 mmol/hour is unsafe through a peripheral line and does not fix the cause.
    • Why B is wrong. More potassium will not work while magnesium is low, and the QT interval makes delay unsafe.
    • Why D is wrong. Spironolactone may help later but it does not treat the acute deficit or the long QT, and stopping potassium is unsafe.

    Topic: Renal: hypokalaemia that does not respond to potassium replacement. Reference: Huang CL, Kuo E. Mechanism of hypokalemia in magnesium deficiency. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007;18:2649-52

  2. Question 2

    Internal MedicineMedium

    A 22-year-old man with sickle cell disease is admitted with a vaso-occlusive pain crisis. On day 2 he develops fever of 38.6 C, pleuritic chest pain and cough. His oxygen saturation is 89% on air, and a chest X-ray shows a new right lower lobe infiltrate. Which is the most appropriate management?

    • Option A: Therapeutic anticoagulation for presumed pulmonary embolism
    • Option B: Oxygen, analgesia, antibiotics and incentive spirometry, with early specialist review for exchange transfusion
    • Option C: Simple red cell transfusion to a haemoglobin above 130 g/L
    • Option D: Oral antibiotics for pneumonia and discharge once he is afebrile
    Show answer for question 2

    Correct answer: B. Oxygen, analgesia, antibiotics and incentive spirometry, with early specialist review for exchange transfusion

    A new pulmonary infiltrate with fever or respiratory symptoms in sickle cell disease is acute chest syndrome, a leading cause of death in these patients. Management is supportive and active: oxygen to correct hypoxia, careful analgesia without over-sedation, broad-spectrum antibiotics covering atypical organisms, incentive spirometry, cautious fluids to avoid pulmonary oedema, and early haematology and critical care input. Simple or exchange transfusion is used for worsening hypoxia, and haemoglobin is usually not raised much above about 100 g/L because high viscosity can worsen sickling. Embolism is not the first explanation, and oral antibiotics with early discharge under-treat a hypoxic patient.

    • Why A is wrong. Embolism is possible in some patients, but empirical anticoagulation is not the standard first treatment of a new infiltrate with fever.
    • Why C is wrong. Aiming for a haemoglobin well above about 100 g/L increases blood viscosity and can worsen sickling.
    • Why D is wrong. He is hypoxic with an evolving infiltrate, so oral treatment and early discharge is unsafe.

    Topic: Haematology: acute chest syndrome in sickle cell disease. Reference: Howard J, Hart N, Roberts-Harewood M, et al. Guideline on the management of acute chest syndrome in sickle cell disease. Br J Haematol 2015;169:492-505

  3. Question 3

    Obstetrics & GynaecologyMedium

    A 29-year-old woman, 6 days after oocyte collection for IVF, has abdominal distension, nausea and dyspnoea. She has ascites on ultrasound, a haematocrit of 0.52, a normal creatinine and passes 25 mL of urine per hour. Which is the most appropriate management?

    • Option A: Admit for intravenous isotonic fluids, monitoring and thromboprophylaxis
    • Option B: Perform an urgent laparotomy for suspected ovarian torsion or rupture
    • Option C: Give oral furosemide to reduce the ascites and discharge her with early review
    • Option D: Restrict all oral fluids and discharge her home with review in about 2 weeks
    Show answer for question 3

    Correct answer: A. Admit for intravenous isotonic fluids, monitoring and thromboprophylaxis

    This is severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome with haemoconcentration and oliguria from third-space fluid loss. Treatment is supportive: admission, careful intravenous fluid replacement, monitoring of fluid balance, electrolytes and haematocrit, drainage of tense ascites if needed and thromboprophylaxis because of the thrombosis risk. Diuretics worsen intravascular depletion, and surgery is reserved for complications such as torsion or rupture.

    • Why B is wrong. Laparotomy is not indicated without evidence of torsion or rupture.
    • Why C is wrong. Diuretics deplete an already haemoconcentrated intravascular volume and can precipitate renal failure.
    • Why D is wrong. Fluid restriction worsens haemoconcentration and discharge is unsafe with oliguria.

    Topic: Infertility: hyperstimulation syndrome after IVF. Reference: RCOG Green-top Guideline 5 The management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

  4. Question 4

    Obstetrics & GynaecologyMedium

    A 24-year-old woman at 20 weeks of gestation has a reactive treponemal antibody test, confirmed by a positive RPR with a titre of 1:32. She has no symptoms and reports anaphylaxis to penicillin in childhood. Which is the most appropriate management?

    • Option A: A single 2 g oral dose of azithromycin at the next visit
    • Option B: Observation with repeat serology at 28 weeks
    • Option C: Doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 28 days
    • Option D: Penicillin desensitisation in a monitored setting, then benzathine penicillin G
    Show answer for question 4

    Correct answer: D. Penicillin desensitisation in a monitored setting, then benzathine penicillin G

    Penicillin is the only recommended treatment that reliably treats the fetus and prevents congenital syphilis. A pregnant woman with a penicillin allergy should be desensitised in a monitored setting and then treated with benzathine penicillin G. Doxycycline is avoided in pregnancy, and azithromycin has documented treponemal resistance and unreliable placental transfer.

    • Why A is wrong. Azithromycin resistance is well described and it does not reliably treat the fetus.
    • Why B is wrong. Untreated syphilis at this titre risks stillbirth and congenital infection, so waiting is unsafe.
    • Why C is wrong. Doxycycline is contraindicated in pregnancy because of fetal bone and tooth effects and is not adequate for fetal treatment.

    Topic: Antenatal care: syphilis in penicillin allergy. Reference: CDC Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines 2021; WHO guideline on syphilis screening and treatment for pregnant women (2017); BASHH UK national guideline on the management of syphilis (2015)

  5. Question 5

    PaediatricsMedium

    A healthy 10-year-old girl has a younger brother with cystic fibrosis. Both parents are carriers of the same mutation. Her parents ask the chance that she herself is a carrier. Which is the correct probability?

    • Option A: 1 in 2
    • Option B: 2 in 3
    • Option C: 1 in 4
    • Option D: 1 in 3
    Show answer for question 5

    Correct answer: B. 2 in 3

    Each child of two carriers has a 1 in 4 chance of being unaffected non-carrier, a 1 in 2 chance of being a carrier and a 1 in 4 chance of being affected. Since she is known to be unaffected, the affected possibility is excluded, and the remaining outcomes are the 1 in 4 non-carrier and 2 in 4 carrier, which gives a probability of 2 in 3 of being a carrier. The error of answering 1 in 2 ignores the information that she is unaffected.

    • Why A is wrong. One in two is the figure at conception, before it is known that she is unaffected.
    • Why C is wrong. One in four is the chance of being affected, and not of being a carrier.
    • Why D is wrong. One in three is the chance of being a non-carrier among unaffected siblings.

    Topic: Genetics: carrier risk in an unaffected sibling. Reference: Emery's Elements of Medical Genetics, autosomal recessive inheritance and risk calculation; Cystic Fibrosis Trust information on genetics and inheritance

  6. Question 6

    PaediatricsMedium

    A 14-year-old boy is tall with an arm span greater than his height, a pectus carinatum, long fingers and an upward subluxation of the lens on ophthalmic examination. His father died suddenly at 38. What is the most important next investigation?

    • Option A: Serum homocysteine measurement, because the tall stature and lens dislocation suggest homocystinuria as an alternative cause
    • Option B: Karyotype
    • Option C: Echocardiography to measure the aortic root
    • Option D: Abdominal ultrasound
    Show answer for question 6

    Correct answer: C. Echocardiography to measure the aortic root

    The skeletal features, upward lens dislocation and a family history of sudden death suggest Marfan syndrome, caused by mutations in the fibrillin-1 gene (FBN1). The most dangerous complication is progressive aortic root dilatation leading to dissection, and so echocardiography is urgent to measure the root, with beta-blocker or ARB therapy and surveillance. Homocystinuria also causes tall stature and lens dislocation, but the lens moves downward, and it is associated with thrombosis and learning difficulty. A karyotype and abdominal ultrasound do not address the lethal complication.

    • Why A is wrong. Homocystinuria shows downward lens dislocation, and the cardiac risk is the more urgent question.
    • Why B is wrong. A karyotype does not diagnose Marfan syndrome.
    • Why D is wrong. An abdominal ultrasound does not assess the main life-threatening problem.

    Topic: Genetics: Marfan syndrome. Reference: Revised Ghent nosology for Marfan syndrome (Loeys BL et al. J Med Genet 2010); American Heart Association and ACC guideline for diseases of the aorta

  7. Question 7

    SurgeryEasy

    A 55-year-old short-sighted man has had flashes and a shower of new floaters in the left eye for 2 days. Since this morning a dark curtain has been spreading across the upper part of his vision. His acuity is currently 6/9. Which is the most appropriate action?

    • Option A: Routine optometry review in 4 weeks
    • Option B: Start oral prednisolone and arrange an MRI of the brain
    • Option C: Start topical corticosteroid drops and review in 1 week with a routine ophthalmology appointment
    • Option D: Same-day referral to an ophthalmologist for dilated fundus examination
    Show answer for question 7

    Correct answer: D. Same-day referral to an ophthalmologist for dilated fundus examination

    Flashes, new floaters and a spreading visual field defect in a myopic eye are the classic symptoms of retinal detachment, which is an ophthalmic emergency. Prompt repair, by laser, vitrectomy or a scleral buckle, can save central vision, especially before the macula detaches. Visual acuity may still be good at this stage, which is the window to act. Delay risks permanent loss of vision, and steroids and brain imaging have no role.

    • Why A is wrong. A delay of weeks allows the macula to detach and vision to be lost for good.
    • Why B is wrong. Steroids and neuroimaging do not address a retinal tear or detachment.
    • Why C is wrong. Topical steroids do not reattach the retina.

    Topic: Retinal detachment. Reference: Royal College of Ophthalmologists, retinal detachment guidance; Kanski's Clinical Ophthalmology, retinal detachment

  8. Question 8

    SurgeryMedium

    A 60-year-old man is given bupivacaine for a brachial plexus block. Five minutes later he reports perioral tingling and a metallic taste, then becomes confused and has a generalised seizure. His pulse falls to 40 per minute and the monitor shows a widening QRS complex. Which is the most appropriate treatment?

    • Option A: Intravenous lidocaine for the arrhythmia
    • Option B: Stop the injection, support the airway and give an intravenous bolus of 20 percent lipid emulsion
    • Option C: Standard advanced life support doses of adrenaline 1 mg, repeated every 3 minutes and treat the arrhythmia first
    • Option D: Intravenous calcium chloride 10 mL of 10 percent
    Show answer for question 8

    Correct answer: B. Stop the injection, support the airway and give an intravenous bolus of 20 percent lipid emulsion

    Perioral numbness, seizure and cardiovascular collapse minutes after injection of a long-acting local anaesthetic indicate local anaesthetic systemic toxicity. The Association of Anaesthetists guidance is to stop injecting, call for help, give oxygen and airway support, control seizures with a benzodiazepine, and give a bolus of 20 percent lipid emulsion followed by an infusion. Adrenaline is used in small doses of 1 microgram per kilogram or less, because large doses may worsen outcome. Lidocaine is itself a local anaesthetic and calcium is not part of the treatment.

    • Why A is wrong. Lidocaine is a sodium channel blocker like bupivacaine and can worsen the toxicity.
    • Why C is wrong. Standard doses of adrenaline can impair lipid rescue and are not advised, and small doses are used if needed.
    • Why D is wrong. Calcium does not reverse sodium channel blockade by local anaesthetic.

    Topic: Local anaesthetic systemic toxicity. Reference: Association of Anaesthetists guideline on the management of severe local anaesthetic toxicity; Miller's Anesthesia, local anaesthetics

  9. Question 9

    Family MedicineEasy

    A 29-year-old woman at 32 weeks of pregnancy has tingling in the thumb, index and middle fingers that wakes her at night and eases when she shakes her hand. Phalen test is positive and there is no thenar wasting. What is the most appropriate management?

    • Option A: Carpal tunnel decompression surgery during this trimester, with a local steroid injection first
    • Option B: Immediate nerve conduction studies and electromyography
    • Option C: An oral prednisolone course of 30 mg daily for 2 weeks
    • Option D: Night-time neutral wrist splints and reassurance that symptoms often settle after delivery
    Show answer for question 9

    Correct answer: D. Night-time neutral wrist splints and reassurance that symptoms often settle after delivery

    Carpal tunnel syndrome is common in late pregnancy because of fluid retention, and symptoms usually resolve within weeks of delivery. Neutral wrist splints worn at night are the first-line treatment, with a local steroid injection reserved for troublesome symptoms. Surgery and nerve studies are for persistent symptoms, motor weakness or atypical features, which are absent here.

    • Why A is wrong. Surgery is for severe or persistent disease with motor loss and is not needed here.
    • Why B is wrong. Nerve studies are not needed when the diagnosis is clinical and there is no weakness.
    • Why C is wrong. Systemic steroids add risk and are not first-line in pregnancy.

    Topic: Common presentation: carpal tunnel syndrome in pregnancy. Reference: NICE Clinical Knowledge Summaries: Carpal tunnel syndrome

  10. Question 10

    Family MedicineEasy

    A 58-year-old man with erectile dysfunction has stable angina and uses sublingual glyceryl trinitrate when he has chest pain. He asks for sildenafil. What is the most appropriate response?

    • Option A: Prescribe sildenafil 25 mg, which is safe to combine with nitrates at this dose
    • Option B: Prescribe sildenafil and advise him to avoid glyceryl trinitrate for 4 hours after each dose
    • Option C: Prescribe tadalafil instead, because it does not interact with nitrates
    • Option D: Withhold PDE5 inhibitors while he uses nitrates and review alternatives
    Show answer for question 10

    Correct answer: D. Withhold PDE5 inhibitors while he uses nitrates and review alternatives

    Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors potentiate the vasodilator effect of nitrates and can cause profound, potentially fatal hypotension, so concurrent use is contraindicated for all agents in the class, including tadalafil, whose effect lasts up to 48 hours. A man with angina who may need glyceryl trinitrate urgently cannot reliably avoid it. Alternatives include vacuum devices, intracavernosal alprostadil and review of his cardiac status with his cardiologist.

    • Why A is wrong. A lower dose does not remove the risk of severe hypotension.
    • Why B is wrong. Delayed nitrate use is unsafe because he may need it for an acute attack.
    • Why C is wrong. Tadalafil is also contraindicated with nitrates and has a longer duration of action.

    Topic: Erectile dysfunction in a man who uses nitrates. Reference: EAU Guidelines on Sexual and Reproductive Health

  11. Question 11

    PsychiatryMedium

    A 26-year-old woman developed sudden weakness of the left leg after a family argument and cannot walk unaided. Examination shows a positive Hoover sign, normal reflexes and normal tone. MRI of the brain and spine is normal. She is distressed and is not feigning symptoms. Which is the most appropriate approach?

    • Option A: Explain this is a genuine functional disorder and arrange physiotherapy
    • Option B: Tell her the symptoms are imagined and that she should simply try harder
    • Option C: Repeat the MRI scan and add lumbar puncture until a structural cause is found
    • Option D: Start an antipsychotic drug to treat the disturbance of movement
    Show answer for question 11

    Correct answer: A. Explain this is a genuine functional disorder and arrange physiotherapy

    Functional neurological disorder is a genuine condition in which symptoms arise from altered nervous system function and not from structural damage. It is diagnosed on positive clinical signs, such as the Hoover sign, as well as a normal investigation result. Management begins with a clear, non-judgemental explanation, followed by physiotherapy-led rehabilitation, with psychological therapy for associated distress and treatment of comorbid depression or anxiety. Dismissal worsens outcomes, repeated investigation reinforces illness beliefs, and antipsychotics have no role.

    • Why B is wrong. Telling her the symptoms are imagined is inaccurate and damages trust and outcomes.
    • Why C is wrong. Further investigations without new findings reinforce illness beliefs and add risk.
    • Why D is wrong. Antipsychotics are not effective for functional motor symptoms and carry adverse effects.

    Topic: Functional neurological disorder: communicating the diagnosis. Reference: Stone J et al. Functional neurological disorder: defying dualism. World Psychiatry 2024; NICE QS198 Suspected neurological conditions: functional neurological disorders in adults

  12. Question 12

    PsychiatryMedium

    A 24-year-old man with a first episode of psychosis is threatening staff on a ward. Verbal de-escalation has failed and he refuses oral medication. He has never taken an antipsychotic, no ECG is available, and he has no known physical illness. Which is the most appropriate medication?

    • Option A: Intramuscular lorazepam, with monitoring of respiratory rate and oxygen saturation
    • Option B: Intramuscular chlorpromazine, with blood pressure checks afterwards
    • Option C: Intramuscular diazepam, repeated every 15 minutes until he is calm
    • Option D: Intramuscular haloperidol alone, with an ECG when one is available
    Show answer for question 12

    Correct answer: A. Intramuscular lorazepam, with monitoring of respiratory rate and oxygen saturation

    When oral treatment is refused and rapid tranquillisation is needed, NICE NG10 recommends intramuscular lorazepam alone, or intramuscular haloperidol combined with promethazine. It advises lorazepam when the person has not taken antipsychotic medication before, and advises avoiding haloperidol with promethazine and using lorazepam when no ECG has been carried out. The first prescription is a single dose that is reviewed before any repeat, and physical monitoring follows. Intramuscular diazepam and chlorpromazine are not among the NG10 options: diazepam is painful and erratically absorbed, and chlorpromazine causes hypotension and lowers the seizure threshold.

    • Why B is wrong. Intramuscular chlorpromazine is not an NG10 option, and it causes hypotension and lowers the seizure threshold.
    • Why C is wrong. Intramuscular diazepam is not an NG10 option, it is painful and erratically absorbed, and NG10 advises a single dose and review rather than repeats every 15 minutes.
    • Why D is wrong. NG10 advises avoiding intramuscular haloperidol when no ECG has been done, and an antipsychotic-naive man is at high risk of acute dystonia.

    Topic: Psychiatric emergencies: rapid tranquillisation in an antipsychotic-naive patient. Reference: NICE NG10 Violence and aggression: short-term management in mental health, health and community settings

  13. Question 13

    Public Health & Preventive MedicineMedium

    A cohort study follows 5,000 factory workers for 20 years and compares their all-cause mortality with that of the general population. The standardised mortality ratio is 0.78 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.85), although the work involves a known hazard. What is the most likely explanation for the lower mortality?

    • Option A: Recall bias because workers reported their exposures themselves
    • Option B: Healthy worker effect because fit people are selected into employment
    • Option C: Lead-time bias because workers are diagnosed earlier
    • Option D: Confounding because the workers are older than the general population
    Show answer for question 13

    Correct answer: B. Healthy worker effect because fit people are selected into employment

    Comparing workers with the general population often shows lower mortality because people who are ill or disabled are less likely to be employed, and those who become ill leave work. This selection bias is called the healthy worker effect, and it can hide a true hazard. Using an internal comparison group of less exposed workers reduces it. The general population includes people too ill to work, so the SMR is biased downward.

    • Why A is wrong. Recall bias concerns self-reported exposure in case-control designs, and this cohort did not rely on recall.
    • Why C is wrong. Lead-time bias concerns screening and survival time, and this study has no screening element.
    • Why D is wrong. Older workers would have higher, not lower, mortality, and the SMR is already age standardised.

    Topic: Bias: healthy worker effect in an occupational cohort. Reference: Gordis Epidemiology: Selection bias and the healthy worker effect

  14. Question 14

    Public Health & Preventive MedicineMedium

    A trial reports that a drug halves the risk of stroke. Over 5 years, stroke occurred in 2 percent of treated patients and in 4 percent of control patients. Which statement best communicates the result to a patient?

    • Option A: The absolute risk reduction is 50 percent because the risk has halved
    • Option B: The relative risk reduction of 50 percent is the same as the number needed to treat
    • Option C: Treatment prevents half of all strokes in everyone who takes it, so half of all patients will benefit
    • Option D: Treatment lowers the 5-year stroke risk from 4 in 100 to 2 in 100, a 2 percentage point reduction
    Show answer for question 14

    Correct answer: D. Treatment lowers the 5-year stroke risk from 4 in 100 to 2 in 100, a 2 percentage point reduction

    The relative risk reduction is (4 - 2) / 4 = 50 percent, but the absolute risk reduction is 4 - 2 = 2 percentage points, and the number needed to treat is 1 / 0.02 = 50. Presenting the absolute change, or natural frequencies such as 4 in 100 to 2 in 100, helps patients understand their own benefit, because relative reductions can make small absolute effects sound large. Not everyone who takes the drug benefits.

    • Why A is wrong. The risk has halved in relative terms, but the absolute reduction is 2 percentage points.
    • Why B is wrong. The number needed to treat is 50, which is a different measure from the relative risk reduction of 50 percent.
    • Why C is wrong. Most treated patients would not have had a stroke in any case, so half of all patients do not benefit.

    Topic: Relative risk reduction and absolute risk reduction: communicating results. Reference: Gigerenzer G et al. Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychol Sci Public Interest 2007

Practise more physicians questions

A free account lets you practise by subject, review your mistakes and track progress. Nothing to pay.

Create a free account

Meddex is an independent preparation platform and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Dubai Health Authority (DHA), Prometric, UAE University or the National Institute of Health Specialties (NIHS). Always confirm exam details on the official websites. Last reviewed .

Frequently asked questions